![]() ![]() The reviewer concluded that players wanting a Quake expansion would be better off getting Scourge of Armagon or Dissolution of Eternity. They gave it a 2.5 out of 5 in both graphics and funfactor, a 3.0 in sound, and a 3.5 in control, and suggested gamers "just stick with regular Quake." GameSpot criticized the choppy animation and found the game unreasonably difficult, primarily due to the clumsy and underpowered weapons, which are difficult to use, have frustrating pauses in between bursts of fire, and require numerous dead-on hits to kill a single opponent. GamePro railed against the plain, boring level designs, lack of personality in the X-Men clones, uninspired weapons, and the fact that the X-Men themselves are only playable in multiplayer mode. Cirulis concurred: "there just isn't enough here to justify calling this a 'superhero game'." He elaborated that while the X-Men are given strong, interesting interpretations in the Quake engine, the player character is dull and the overall game lacks the feel of an X-Men license. Geoff Stratton of Computer Games Strategy Plus called it "an uneven product whose generally unoriginal gameplay isn't consistent with its superhero mythmaking or humorously overwrought comic-book repartee." In Computer Gaming World, Martin E. ![]() X-Men: The Ravages of Apocalypse was met with overwhelmingly negative reviews. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |